Retrieved January 4, There is not much evidence of “obvious distaste and reluctance” to kill Poles to be seen in this episode. Under its influence the vast majority of Germans wanted to eliminate Jews from German society, and the perpetrators of the Holocaust did what they did because they thought it was “right and necessary. How would you define and explain this “moral” system? Cambridge University Press, pp Can you explain this statement?
See all reviews. Hilberg, to whom Browning dedicated his monograph, wrote that “Goldhagen has left us with the image of a medieval-like incubus, a demon latent in the German mind Views Read Edit View history. Goldhagen was awarded the Democracy Prize in by the German Journal for German and International Politics , which asserted that “because of the penetrating quality and the moral power of his presentation, Daniel Goldhagen has greatly stirred the consciousness of the German public. For half a century people have wondered how the Holocaust could have taken place in a “civilized” country.
Questions and Topics for Discussion 1.
All this is absurd, because the criticism of Goldhagen is backed up so well. April 8, Goldhagen’s willing executioners: Eloquently written, meticulously documented, impassioned It was the leading monotheistic religion in the Roman Empire immediately before the conversion of Constantine.
Germans intermarried with Jews: Around the globe there have been dozens of self-declared fascist movements and a good deal more that go by different labelsand executiondrs of them have embraced Nazi-style goldhavens.
Human traits do run in certain genetically related populations sickle cell disease or pseudocholinesterase deficiency for example but humans are less dissimilar from each other than dogs goldhagnes cats are. Had there not been a depression in Germany, then in all likelihood the Nazis wouldn’t have come to power. Almond Award for the best dissertation in the field of comparative politics. Mindless Islamophobia is a striking example. That view was the mainspring of what was, in essence, voluntary barbarism.
The conclusion of the book, which was much influenced by the Milgram experiment on obedience, was that the men of Unit were not demons or Nazi fanatics but ordinary middle-aged men of working-class background from Hamburgwho had been drafted but found unfit for military duty.
Ruth Bettina Birn and Volker Riess recognised the need to examine the primary sources the Police Battalion investigation records Goldhagen had cited and determine if Goldhagen had applied the historical method in his research. The book was a “publishing phenomenon”,  achieving fame in both the United States and Germany, despite its “mostly scathing” reception among historians,  who were unusually vocal in condemning it as ahistorical and, in the words of Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg”totally wrong about everything” and “worthless”.
Author goes to Berlin to debate Holocaust. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. This page was last edited on 24 Marchat What is striking among some of those who have criticized my book — against whom so many people in Germany are openly reacting — is that much of what they have written and said has either a tenuous relationship to the book’s contents or is patently false.
Hitler’s Willing Executioners – Wikipedia
Can you explain this denial? The antagonist as liberator The New York Times. Hitler’s Willing Executioners provides conclusive evidence that the extermination of European Jewry engaged the energies and enthusiasm of tens of thousands of ordinary Germans.
Retrieved 26 October Goldhagen does not say that every German physically committed mass murder, but that decades of anti-Jewish propaganda coupled with a leader willing to sanction such a brutal enterprise gave average German citizens the ability and opportunity to become exeutioners. It can do nothing of the sort.
Follow the Author
Some historians have characterized its reception as an extension of the Historikerstreitthe German historiographical debate of the s that sought to explain Nazi history.
As a human race, we haven’t come very far. Showing of reviews. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews.
I finally got around to reading this book. He does not allow the witness statements he uses to speak for themselves.
Inthe American historian David Exedutioners wrote a highly critical book review in the National Review of Hitler’s Willing Executioners where he charged Goldhagen with grossly simplifying the question of the degree and virulence of German Antisemitismand of only selecting evidence that supported his thesis. In times of crisis.
Hitler’s Willing Executioners Reader’s Guide
Goldhagen’s book tour became, in the opinion of some German media voices, “a triumphant march”, as “the open-mindedness that Goldhagen encountered in the land of the perpetrators” was “gratifying” and something of which Germans ought to be proud, even in the context of a book which sought, according to some critics, to “erase the distinction between Germans and Nazis”.
Do you agree with his conclusions? A Reply to My Critics:.